About your Search

20140226
20140306
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
that has ever done that. >> you have said the campaign is about jobs and education. it talked about tax incentives in regulation. what kind of tax incentives would you pursue? how much would that cost? contest to compete to bring jobs to their states. we are not competing. we are asleep. governor brown is not traveling insane bring your factory here. elon musk just yesterday announced his new battery factory. not looking to build in california. i do not fault elon musk for making a wild business decision. we need to improve california's economic climate so we are in the hunt. if you look up these windows, we have some natural advantages in california. nobody wants to move to texas. people love california. we do not need to be the cheapest place in the world but we need to be competitive and we are not. in arizona,building apple in texas. how would you get them to do california instead. >> the regulatory litigation complex in sacramento is out of control. hundreds of regulations every year. it is like a giant ball of yarn because bigger and bigger. we need to reign that and. when legisla
and said it is about jobs and education. you talk about tax incentives and regulations. what kind of tax incentives would you pursue and how much would they cost? >> there is a contest among all 50 states to compete to bring jobs to their states. we are not competing. we are asleep. governor brown is not traveling to other states to bring factories here. elon musk just two days ago announced his new gigafactory - >> up $5 billion battery factory not to be built in california. >> not even considering california. i don't fault him for making a wise business decision but went to improve california's economic climate so we are in the hunt. if you look outside these windows, we have some natural advantages in california. i like to joke that nobody wants to move to texas. people of california. we don't need to be the cheapest place in the world but we need to be competitive and were not. >> apple is building a factory in arizona, samsung in texas -- how would you get them to choose california instead? >> first of all, the regulatory litigation complex in sacramento is out of control. hundreds
. how big of a problem is there? my iphone, as i understand it, someone could see all of my tax and swipes and browsing. >> absolutely. people have a general idea that these devices are impervious to hacking. they think it is possible to take them over. apple has taken care of security so you don't have to worry about that. attacks against the bones have been so low compared to the entry platform. people get the idea that they are secure. mightmight be that they be a little less careful when they install applications. flaw.l me about the >> it is a vulnerability in the operating system that allows people to break out and gain permissions on your phone. apple tries to prevent your applications from doing certain things. when you actually cap keyser numbers, they are reading that raw data. this allows the hacker the ability to do that. it can record all the thumbprints on your scanner. how big a vulnerability would that be? 7 thing laste ios flaw,plus the os x off -- it sounds really bad. >> everyone runs on iphones. most people are not running any sort of application on their mac
, uber is charging the normal rate, 30%h at least in boston is below what taxes are. during 10% of the time, they are charging server -- search prices. uber needs to come out and say, we have got a great service. you use it and i certainly do. it is a great service. most of the time, it will be very cheap. sometimes, it is part of our business model where we will raised rices. if you cannot during that time, we understand that and you -- we hope you forgive us. come back when prices are low. that is a reasonable pricing strategy. >> i use uber. one of the things you suggest i found interesting is you think uber should consider raising prices during off-peak time, like raising the cheapest price. tell me more. >> the question is certainly, here in boston, the problem is in the current system during cream skin.you get a lot of drivers sitting on the sideline and the minute it looks go, you will get these drivers to come in and that opportunistic -- uber really needs to focus on making drivers 90% of the time are driving at the regular price, it is a possible endeavor for them. i
about the price tax. than $19worth more billion. it is hard to make that case today because they have so little revenue compared to that number. the reality is there are very few services the region $1 billion and they are more valuable than that. i could be wrong. the recent chance it could be the one service that could get to $1 billion. i do not think im. >> zuckerberg talked about to get a billions of people to the internet saying there are benefits to providing free access. had to say about the profitability of the project. ofbreak even and have a bit work to do. we are very early. that is what a lot of these partnerships are. we work with folks and it is not you will spend more than what you are making up front. what we have seen, we are highly confident will go to a point where it is profitable. >> for more now, cory johnson and i spoke to paul kedrosky as mr. as former ceo executive rosenthal. i asked him if it was worth more than $19 billion. at oneoes groaned million users a day. 72% daily active users. people are getting on the service talking about the things they are interes
that using spacex would save the federal government $1 billion in tax savings for didayers every year, and he that well sitting next to a competitor and said the current state of the market is unsustainable. >> the air force and other agencies are paying too high a price for lunch. the impact was protectable. space launch innovation stagnated, compared to competition. prices of 11 to rebels -- levels that general shelton have called unsustainable. evolvedsue is the expendable launch vehicle program, a $70 billion program that is the federal government's answer for reducing the cost of military satellite launches. dominated byt is united launch alliance because spacex, although it's trying to get a spot in the certification program, does not have the approval to do so. years held the monopoly. it's a joint venture between defense giants, lockheed martin and boeing. ceo says that he does not think that breaking up that monopoly in the name of competition will really have that big of a payoff. take a listen. >> they are important questions about how competitions will be structured. to ensure the
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)